refactor: enhance MCP tool management with risk policies and confirmation handling
This commit is contained in:
@@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ type MCPToolInfoResponse struct {
|
||||
Description string `json:"description"`
|
||||
InputSchema any `json:"inputSchema"`
|
||||
OutputSchema any `json:"outputSchema,omitempty"`
|
||||
ReadOnlyHint bool `json:"readOnlyHint"`
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func BuildMCPToolInfoResponses(items []mcps.ToolInfo) []MCPToolInfoResponse {
|
||||
@@ -63,21 +64,25 @@ func BuildMCPToolInfoResponses(items []mcps.ToolInfo) []MCPToolInfoResponse {
|
||||
Description: item.Description,
|
||||
InputSchema: item.InputSchema,
|
||||
OutputSchema: item.OutputSchema,
|
||||
ReadOnlyHint: item.ReadOnlyHint,
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
return ret
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
type MCPToolCatalogResponse struct {
|
||||
ToolCode string `json:"toolCode"`
|
||||
ServerCode string `json:"serverCode"`
|
||||
ToolName string `json:"toolName"`
|
||||
SourceType enums.ToolSourceType `json:"sourceType"`
|
||||
AutoInjected bool `json:"autoInjected"`
|
||||
Title string `json:"title"`
|
||||
Description string `json:"description"`
|
||||
InputSchema any `json:"inputSchema"`
|
||||
OutputSchema any `json:"outputSchema,omitempty"`
|
||||
ToolCode string `json:"toolCode"`
|
||||
ServerCode string `json:"serverCode"`
|
||||
ToolName string `json:"toolName"`
|
||||
SourceType enums.ToolSourceType `json:"sourceType"`
|
||||
AutoInjected bool `json:"autoInjected"`
|
||||
Title string `json:"title"`
|
||||
Description string `json:"description"`
|
||||
InputSchema any `json:"inputSchema"`
|
||||
OutputSchema any `json:"outputSchema,omitempty"`
|
||||
RiskLevel string `json:"riskLevel"`
|
||||
RequireConfirmation bool `json:"requireConfirmation"`
|
||||
RiskEditable bool `json:"riskEditable"`
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
type MCPToolResultContentResponse struct {
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user